Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Мир Российская Премьер-лига|19-й тур
。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法2026作为进阶阅读
仲裁机构的组成人员每届任期五年，任期届满的应当依法换届，更换不少于三分之一的组成人员。。业内人士推荐heLLoword翻译官方下载作为进阶阅读
concerns of bankers who were nervous about dispensing cash so far from the
“十五五”时期，我国发展环境面临深刻复杂变化：向内看，人口老龄化程度加深，资源环境等硬约束增强，传统经济增长动力逐步减弱；向外看，经济全球化遭遇逆流，世界经济增长乏力。